Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. How Can Our Translation Agency Make Sure Every Translator Uses the Client's Approved Terminology?
Problems We Solve

How Can Our Translation Agency Make Sure Every Translator Uses the Client's Approved Terminology?

Client glossaries live in emails and spreadsheets, so translators miss approved terms. We build one termbase per client, term approval and QA checks.

Updated 3 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Terminology slips because each client's approved terms are spread across old spreadsheets, emails and translators' own notes, so different translators use different words. We build one managed termbase per client, a process for proposing and approving new terms with the client, automatic delivery of the termbase into your CAT tool, and QA checks that flag terms not used.

'We told you last year we call it a housing, not a casing'

A client's engineering reviewer sends back a German translation with forty corrections. Most are the same thing: the translator used standard terms where the client has its own. The client says they supplied a glossary last year. Your PM finds it, eventually: an Excel file attached to an email to a PM who has since left. It was never loaded into the termbase. Two other translators have also been working on this client's documents without it.

Nobody was careless. The glossary simply never made it from an inbox into the translators' tools.

Why terminology drifts

  • Client glossaries arrive in varied formats and are not always imported into the CAT tool.
  • Terms agreed during queries or reviews stay in emails instead of the termbase.
  • Different translators keep their own notes, which never reach colleagues.
  • Termbases are not updated when a client changes a preferred term.
  • Nobody checks consistently whether approved terms were used before delivery.

What drifting terminology costs

Client complaints and rework, which eat margin and patience. Reviewers correcting the same terms again and again. Inconsistency across a client's documents, which matters a great deal in regulated or technical content. And a risk to the relationship with clients who feel they have told you something before.

Source of termsWhere it ends up todayWhere it goes in the build
Client-supplied glossaryEmail attachmentImported into the client termbase after checking
Translator query answersEmail threadProposed as a term for approval
Reviewer correctionsTracked changes in a fileProposed as a term for approval
Client in-country reviewComments in a PDFProposed and confirmed with the client

How we build terminology management

  1. Each client gets one termbase per subject area, held in your CAT tool or TMS, for example Trados MultiTerm, memoQ termbases or Phrase termbases, or in a central store that syncs to them.
  2. Existing glossaries are gathered, cleaned and de-duplicated, with conflicting entries listed for a PM or the client to decide.
  3. New terms can be proposed by translators, reviewers or PMs through a simple form, and suggested automatically from query answers and reviewer corrections.
  4. Proposed terms go to an approver, either your lead linguist or the client's contact, with context, and are added once approved, with notes on usage and forbidden alternatives.
  5. The current termbase is attached to every new job for that client automatically, so no translator starts without it.
  6. Before delivery, a QA check flags segments where a source term appears but the approved target term does not, using your QA tool such as Xbench or Verifika, or the checks built into your CAT tool.

Approving terminology is a linguistic and client decision. The build makes sure decisions are captured once and used every time.

What changes

Forbidden terms deserve their own mention. Many clients care as much about words they do not want, such as a competitor's product name or an outdated brand term, as about the ones they do. Recording those as forbidden alternatives means QA can catch them too, which is often what a client's reviewer is checking for first.

We also keep an eye on the source side. When a client's own source documents use two names for the same thing, translators face a choice the client never made. Those cases are listed as queries for the client, so the decision is made once and recorded.

Translators start every job with the current approved terms. Corrections from reviewers and clients are captured and do not need repeating. QA flags missed terms before the client sees them. Clients see their preferences respected, which builds trust, and reviewers spend time on genuine quality points instead of the same terminology.

Does your terminology look like this?

  • Client glossaries are attached to old emails.
  • Different translators use different terms for the same client.
  • Reviewers correct the same terms repeatedly.
  • Terms agreed in queries never reach the termbase.
  • There is no automatic check for approved terms before delivery.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

Which CAT tools does this work with?

Most major ones, including Trados Studio, memoQ and Phrase, through their termbase formats or APIs. We check yours first.

Can clients approve terms themselves?

Yes, if you want them to. Clients can be given a simple page to approve or reject proposed terms.

What if the client's glossary contradicts itself?

Conflicts are listed during clean-up for a person to resolve with the client before the termbase is used.

What affects the cost?

The number of clients and termbases, the state of existing glossaries and how the approval flow should work.

Keep reading

More on Problems We Solve

Start here

Tell us how jobs move through your agency

Describe how a job travels from enquiry to delivery today, which CAT and management tools you use and where your project managers lose time. We will tell you what we would build around your existing tools, and if a smaller change would fix it, we will say so.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →