Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. How Do We Turn the Agronomist's Recommendation Sheets Into Clear Jobs for the Team?
Problems We Solve

How Do We Turn the Agronomist's Recommendation Sheets Into Clear Jobs for the Team?

Farm agronomist recommendations arrive as PDFs and get retyped into job sheets. We turn each one into operator jobs by field and track which are done.

Updated 3 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Agronomist recommendations reach the farm as PDFs or emails, get printed, and are turned into jobs by whoever is planning the week, which is where fields get missed and old recommendations get used. We read each recommendation into a job list by field and operation, track which are done, and flag recommendations that have been superseded or are running late.

A stack of recommendation sheets on the office printer

Your agronomist walks the crops and sends recommendations. They come as PDFs, sometimes three in a week, sometimes one covering thirty fields, sometimes an amended version of last week's with a different product because of supply. The farm manager prints them, sticks them to the office wall, and works out who is doing what tomorrow.

By Thursday the wall has recommendations for fungicides, a growth regulator, a trace element and a herbicide for one field that was not on the first sheet. Some jobs are done, some are half done, and one field was sprayed from last week's sheet, not the amended one. The operator did exactly what the sheet in his cab said.

Why recommendations and field work drift apart

The weak point is the hand-off, not the advice. A recommendation is written by field and product, but work is planned by machine, operator and day. Somebody has to translate one into the other every time, by hand.

The recommendation saysThe operator needs to know
Fields, products and ratesWhich fields today, in what order, with what tank mix
A timing windowWhether it is urgent this week or can wait
Amended version, datedThat the old sheet in the cab is no longer valid
Notes on conditionsWhat to check before starting
Split recommendations for parts of fieldsWhere the boundary between the parts is

Timing windows collide in spring. The agronomist is right about each field on its own, but the farm has one sprayer, one operator and a limited number of good spraying days. The job of turning a set of recommendations into a workable week usually falls on a farm manager who is also doing ten other things.

What a missed or outdated job costs

A field missed in a spray programme, or sprayed from a superseded sheet, is a real cost to the crop, and the agronomy side of that is for you and your agronomist. The admin side is that nobody can easily tell which recommendations have been fully carried out, which are part done and which were quietly forgotten.

There is also the time spent. Every week, someone reads PDFs, writes job lists, rings the operator, checks what got done, and then passes the same information to the office for the spray record. The same facts are written three or four times.

How we turn recommendations into a job list

What we build is a job list that fills itself from your agronomist's recommendations and tracks each one to completion.

  1. Recommendations are emailed or forwarded to a dedicated address. The system reads each one, whatever the layout, and pulls out fields, products, rates, timing and notes. A person checks the reading before it becomes a job.
  2. Each field and operation becomes a job, linked to your field list, so a recommendation for 'Barn Field' lands on the right field even if the agronomist uses a slightly different name.
  3. When an amended recommendation arrives for the same fields, the older jobs are marked superseded and removed from the operator's list, with the change shown.
  4. The farm manager sees all open jobs by timing window, grouped so jobs with the same tank mix and nearby fields sit together. Planning the day is a matter of picking from the list, not rewriting it.
  5. The operator sees today's jobs on a phone or cab tablet, in order, and ticks each field done, which starts the spray record for that field.
  6. Jobs past their timing window, or recommendations with fields not yet started, are highlighted for the manager each morning.

We do not change or second-guess the recommendation. The job list is a copy of what the agronomist said, organised so the farm can act on it.

Planning the spraying week from one list

On Monday morning the farm manager opens the job list. Two recommendations came in over the weekend and one amendment. The amended fields show as changed, and the old jobs have gone from the operator's view. The manager groups the fungicide jobs on the home block for Tuesday, leaves the trace element until later in the week, and sends the day's list to the operator.

By Wednesday night the list shows two fields left from the first recommendation, and the manager can tell the agronomist exactly where things stand without walking to the wall.

Is this how recommendations reach your team?

  • Recommendation PDFs are printed and pinned to a wall or put in the cab.
  • Amended recommendations sometimes do not replace the old sheet in the tractor.
  • Nobody can quickly say which fields on a recommendation are still to do.
  • The same details are written into job lists, spray records and the office system.
  • Planning the spraying week takes the farm manager an evening.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

Does our agronomist need to change how they write recommendations?

No. We read the recommendations in the format they already send. If they come from a known agronomy system in a consistent layout, the reading is simpler.

Will the system suggest what to spray?

No. It copies and organises the agronomist's recommendation. Agronomy decisions stay with your agronomist and you.

What if the reading step gets a rate wrong?

Every recommendation is checked by a person before it becomes a job, with the original PDF alongside, so misreadings are caught before anything reaches an operator.

Does this also produce the spray record?

It can start one. When a job is ticked done, the details carry into the record for the operator to confirm and complete.

Keep reading

More on Problems We Solve

Start here

Tell us how your crop records get from the cab to the office

Describe who does the field work, where they write it down, what software or spreadsheets the office uses and what your agronomist sends you. We will tell you honestly what is worth building, and if your existing crop recording package can do it with better set-up, we will say so.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →