Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. How Do We Stop Chasing the Lab for Water Sample Results and Retyping Them Into Reports?
Problems We Solve

How Do We Stop Chasing the Lab for Water Sample Results and Retyping Them Into Reports?

Water treatment companies chase labs for sample results, then retype them. We build tracking from sample to result, with results matched to sites and clients.

Updated 3 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Lab results go missing because samples are logged on a chain of custody form, results come back as PDFs or portal downloads, and nobody tracks the gap between the two. We build a sample register that expects a result for every sample sent, reads incoming certificates, matches them to the right site and flags anything late or outside the thresholds you set.

The inbox full of certificates of analysis

Your engineers take water samples for legionella, TVC, pseudomonas or other analysis, fill in a chain of custody form, and drop the samples at the lab or hand them to a courier. Some days later results arrive, usually as PDF certificates by email, sometimes through the lab's portal, occasionally as a spreadsheet.

Somebody in the office then has to open each certificate, work out which site and which outlet it relates to, type the results into the client report, and decide whether anything needs escalating under the client's agreed procedure. Meanwhile, samples from last Tuesday have no result yet and nobody has noticed, because there is no list of what is outstanding.

When a client rings to ask where their results are, the answer is a search through the inbox, a call to the lab, and a promise to come back to them.

Labs are not usually the problem. The problem is that your business records samples in one place and receives results in another, with nothing expecting the result to arrive.

StageWhere it lives todayWhat goes wrong
Sample takenPaper or app chain of custody formSample IDs written by hand, sometimes illegibly
Sample sentCourier note or engineer memoryNo record of when the lab received it
Result issuedLab email or portalArrives in a shared inbox nobody owns
Result reportedTyped into client reportTranscription errors, results matched to wrong outlet
Follow-upSomeone remembersOut-of-range results sit unnoticed

Without a register that says 'we sent these twelve samples and expect twelve results', a missing result is invisible.

What delayed and retyped results cost you

Staff time is the obvious cost: opening PDFs, matching sample numbers, typing figures. The less visible cost is risk to your reputation. A result that sits unread in an inbox leaves your client waiting for information they may need to act on, and a figure typed against the wrong outlet can send a resample team to the wrong place.

It also slows your invoicing, because sampling is often billed on result, and it makes your reports late, which is the thing clients notice most.

Sample tracking from chain of custody to client report

  1. Engineers record samples in a mobile form: site, outlet, sample type, analysis requested, time taken. The form prints or displays the sample ID for the bottle label.
  2. A sample register holds every sample as outstanding until a result arrives, with the lab and the date sent.
  3. Incoming lab emails go to a dedicated address. A parser reads the certificate, extracts sample IDs and results, and matches them to the register. Where the lab offers a portal export or API, we pull from that instead.
  4. Matched results are attached to the site and outlet. Anything that cannot be matched with confidence goes to a review queue for a person.
  5. Results are compared against the thresholds you configure for each client and analysis. Anything outside them is flagged to the person responsible, following the procedure you and the client have agreed.
  6. Samples still outstanding after the lab's usual turnaround appear on a chase list, with a pre-filled email to the lab.

We use AI extraction for certificate formats that vary, with a confidence check, and simple rules for labs whose format is fixed. Either way, nothing is written to a client report without matching a known sample.

Life with a sample register

The office no longer asks 'have we had the results for the hotel yet'. They open the register and see it. Late results are chased because the list says so, not because a client complained.

Client reports pull results straight from the register, so figures are never retyped. When a result needs attention, the flag goes to a named person and the record shows who saw it and when, which helps when you need to show what happened.

Does this sound like your office?

  • Lab certificates arrive in a general inbox and wait to be opened.
  • You have no single list of samples awaiting results.
  • Someone retypes results from PDFs into client reports.
  • You have found results filed against the wrong outlet or site.
  • Clients ask for results before you know they have arrived.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

Will this work with the lab we use?

Almost certainly. Most labs send PDF certificates or offer exports, and we build a reader for the formats you actually receive. If a lab has an API, we use it.

What happens if the extraction reads a result wrongly?

Every extracted result is checked against the expected sample, and low-confidence reads go to a person to confirm. You can also require sign-off before results reach a client.

Does the system decide what action to take on a high result?

No. It flags results against thresholds you set and routes them to the person your procedure names. The decision and the advice to the client stay with your competent staff.

Can we keep using paper chain of custody forms?

You can, but the tracking is much stronger when sample IDs are generated digitally, because handwriting is where most matching errors start.

Keep reading

More on Problems We Solve

Start here

Tell us where your water hygiene admin gets stuck

Describe your contracts, how many sites your engineers cover and the systems you use now for scheduling, reports and invoicing. We will tell you what we would build and what we would leave alone. If your current software can do the job with better set-up, we will say so.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →