Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Predicting Real Supplier Lead Times
AI & Machine Learning

Predicting Real Supplier Lead Times

Planning on quoted lead times guarantees surprises. Using your own receipt history to predict actual delivery, with a range rather than a single date.

Updated 2 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Quoted lead times are commitments, not predictions. Your own purchase order and receipt history usually predicts actual arrival far better, and the useful output is a range with a confidence level rather than a single date.

Planning on a number nobody believes

Most planning systems use a lead time held in a supplier master, entered when the supplier was onboarded and rarely revisited. Everyone knows some suppliers run late, and that knowledge lives with individual planners rather than in the system.

The data to do better is almost always already there: purchase order dates, promised dates and goods receipt dates, going back years.

What drives variation

  • The supplier and the specific item - lead times vary hugely within one supplier's range
  • Order size, which can trigger a different production run or shipping mode
  • Time of year, including factory shutdowns and national holidays in the source country
  • Whether the item was in stock or made to order
  • Route and mode, where these differ between orders
  • How busy the supplier is, which sometimes shows in their recent performance

Seasonal shutdowns are worth special mention because they are knowable in advance and frequently absent from planning systems. A supplier closing for two weeks is not a prediction problem; it is a calendar nobody entered.

Predict a distribution, not a date

A single predicted date is the wrong output. What planning needs is the shape: most likely arrival, and how bad the tail is.

Illustrative example: a supplier whose orders arrive between 18 and 24 days with most at 20 needs different safety stock from one averaging 20 days but occasionally taking 45. The averages match; the risk does not.

OutputUse
Median lead timeNormal planning
80th percentileSafety stock sizing
95th percentileCritical items, risk review
Spread over timeSupplier performance conversations

Using it in supplier management

A by-product of this work is an evidence base for supplier reviews. 'Your quoted lead time is 21 days and your last two years average 29, with a quarter of orders beyond 35' is a different conversation from a general complaint.

It also supports dual-sourcing decisions on the right grounds - reliability rather than only unit price. A cheaper supplier with a long tail can cost more once the safety stock it requires is counted.

A quoted lead time is a promise. Your receipt history is evidence.

Where to be careful

Receipt dates can be misleading. A receipt booked in on Monday for goods that arrived Friday adds noise, and a partial delivery raises the question of what counts as arrival.

Decide these definitions before modelling and apply them consistently. As with most business data problems, the definitions matter more than the algorithm, and getting them wrong quietly biases everything downstream.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

How much purchase history do we need?

Enough orders per supplier and item group to see the pattern, including at least one cycle of any seasonal effects. Suppliers with a handful of orders should fall back to quoted terms.

Can this predict disruption?

Not unforeseeable events. It captures recurring patterns and gradual deterioration, which is most of what affects planning day to day.

Should we share predictions with suppliers?

Sharing the evidence usually improves the conversation. Framing it as shared data rather than accusation tends to get further.

Does this replace safety stock?

No - it sizes it properly. Better lead time prediction usually means less stock in some places and more in others.

Keep reading

More on AI & Machine Learning

Start here

Want machine learning project details from us?

Tell us what you are trying to predict and roughly what data you hold. We will come back with an honest view on whether machine learning is the right tool, what the work would involve and a realistic cost range. If a spreadsheet would do the job, we will say so.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →