Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. How Do We Charge Law Firms per Fee Earner When Nobody Agrees Who Counts?
Problems We Solve

How Do We Charge Law Firms per Fee Earner When Nobody Agrees Who Counts?

Legal tech startups pricing per fee earner end up arguing over trainees, secretaries and part-timers. We build clear seat rules, usage counts and billing sync.

Updated 3 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Per fee earner pricing causes disputes because law firms do not agree internally on who is a fee earner, and your product counts whoever has a login. We build seat types that match how firms think (fee earners, support staff, occasional users), counts drawn from your product and the firm's practice management system, a monthly seat statement the firm can check, and a sync to your billing tool.

A renewal invoice the finance director queries

Your pricing is per fee earner, because that is how law firms budget for software. At renewal, the firm's finance director queries the invoice. You counted everyone with an account. They count partners, associates and solicitors doing chargeable work. In between are trainees, paralegals, legal secretaries who use your product to prepare documents for fee earners, a consultant who works two days a week, and three people on maternity leave.

The account manager and the finance director go back and forth by email. You settle on a number that nobody can explain, and next year the same argument starts again with a different head count.

Why fee earner counts are slippery

In a law firm, fee earner is a working term, not a fixed category. Firms use it differently for billing targets, for their practice management system, and for supplier contracts. Your product adds a third definition: anyone with a login.

  • Trainees and paralegals record time but may not be treated as fee earners for software budgets.
  • Secretaries and assistants use the product on behalf of fee earners, sometimes more than the fee earners do.
  • Part-time staff, consultants and people on leave hold accounts but use them little.
  • Leavers are not removed promptly, so counts drift upward.
  • The contract says per fee earner without defining it.

What seat disputes cost

Every dispute costs goodwill with the finance director, who is often the person deciding whether to renew. Settlements that nobody can explain lead to discounts that become the new baseline. Meanwhile firms sometimes limit access to avoid paying for seats, so support staff who would make heavy use of your product are left out, which reduces its value to the firm.

Your own revenue reporting suffers too. If seat counts are negotiated rather than measured, you cannot forecast renewals or see whether a firm is growing its use of your product.

How we build seat counting firms can check

What we build turns the seat definition into something the product knows about and can report on.

  1. Seat types that reflect how firms work: for example, full fee earner seats, support seats for secretaries and assistants, and occasional-use seats, each with rules you set commercially.
  2. Role information pulled from the firm's practice management system or identity directory, such as job title or fee earner flag, so seat type is suggested rather than guessed.
  3. Usage measured per user, so a seat that has not been used for a period is visible, and a user on leave can be suspended without losing their settings.
  4. Leaver handling through the firm's Microsoft Entra ID or a directory sync, so departed staff stop counting when they leave.
  5. A monthly seat statement for the firm's administrator: users by seat type, changes since last month, and inactive accounts, with the option to reclassify or suspend.
  6. A sync from seat counts to your billing tool, such as Stripe or Chargebee, applying your contract's rules on true-ups.
PersonSuggested seat typeBased on
Partner or associateFee earnerFee earner flag in practice management system
Trainee or paralegalYour commercial ruleJob title from directory
Legal secretarySupportJob title and usage pattern
Consultant two days a weekFee earner or occasionalYour rule and actual usage
On leaveSuspendedAdmin action, settings kept

How you define and price each seat type is a commercial decision for you. What we build makes that definition explicit, visible and consistently applied.

Renewal with a statement on file

Twelve monthly statements have already gone to the firm's administrator. They reclassified a handful of users along the way and suspended two people on leave. At renewal, the finance director sees the same numbers they have been seeing all year. The conversation is about adding a new practice group, not about who counts. Secretaries have their own seat type at a lower price, so the firm gives them access instead of holding them back.

Is seat counting causing friction?

  • Your contract says per fee earner without a definition.
  • Renewals involve arguments about head count.
  • Leavers remain on your seat count for months.
  • Firms keep support staff off your product to save seats.
  • You cannot show a firm how many of its seats were actually used.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

Should we price per fee earner at all?

That is a commercial choice for you. Firms understand it, and it can work well when the definition is clear and measurable.

Can seat types be different for each firm?

Yes. Rules can be set per contract, while the counting and reporting work the same way.

Do we need access to the firm's practice management system?

It helps suggest seat types, but a directory sync or admin classification also works.

What do you need from us?

Your contracts' seat wording, your user model and billing setup, and examples of recent seat disputes.

Keep reading

More on Problems We Solve

Start here

Tell us what is slowing your legal tech product inside law firms

Describe what your product does for law firms, which systems it has to work with and where deals or rollouts get stuck: security reviews, integrations, adoption or support. We will tell you what we would build and what we would not, and if the answer is a document or a process rather than software, we will say so.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →