Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Why Are We Still Building Completion Statements by Hand and Finding Errors on the Day?
Problems We Solve

Why Are We Still Building Completion Statements by Hand and Finding Errors on the Day?

Completion statements built in Excel pick up wrong figures and missing items. How we build conveyancing completion statements from your file data with checks.

Updated 2 min readBy SpiderHunts Technologies

Free estimateNo obligation

Get a free estimate

Tell us what you need. A senior engineer reads every enquiry.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →

Quick answer — TL;DR

Completion statements go wrong when figures are typed from the contract, mortgage offer, redemption statement and bill into a spreadsheet or template by hand, and late changes are not carried through. We build a statement that pulls each figure from its source on the file, runs checks against the contract and ledger, highlights what has changed since the last version, and flags missing items before it goes to the client. The case handler still checks and approves it.

The redemption figure changed on Wednesday

The seller's completion statement was sent on Monday. On Wednesday a new redemption statement arrived with a different daily rate. The estate agent's invoice came in higher than the quote. Nobody updated the statement. On completion day the figures do not reconcile with the money in client account, and the case handler is on the phone with the seller explaining why the balance due to them is different from what they were told.

Everyone is stressed, and the day has more completions in it.

Why completion statements go wrong

A completion statement pulls figures from many places: the contract price and deposit, the mortgage offer, redemption statements, the firm's bill, the agent's invoice, apportionments, search and registration fees. In most firms those are typed into an Excel sheet or a template in the case management system by hand.

Each figure can change after the first version is sent, and each change has to be noticed, typed in and sent again. The statement is only as current as the last time someone updated every line.

FigureTypical source of error
Redemption amountUpdated statement not reflected
Estate agent's feeInvoice differs from the quoted figure
Firm's own billBill amended after statement sent
Deposit paidDeposit held by agent versus paid to firm
ApportionmentsWrong dates or rates for leasehold charges

What statement errors cost

An error found on completion day can hold up money, and money held up can hold up a chain. Correcting a statement after the client has arranged funds or planned around a figure is awkward, and clients remember it. Occasionally the firm ends up covering a shortfall.

Behind all that is the time spent checking each statement line by line because the process is not trusted.

How we build statements from file data

  1. Source every figure: the statement reads the price, deposit and dates from the contract details, the advance from the mortgage offer, redemption figures from the latest redemption statement, and fees from your bill and third-party invoices on the file.
  2. Show the source: each line shows which document it came from and when that document was received, so the case handler can check quickly.
  3. Change detection: when a new redemption statement, invoice or bill arrives, the statement is recalculated and the changes since the last version sent are highlighted.
  4. Checks: the statement is checked against the client ledger (money received and expected), for missing standard items for that transaction type, and for dates that do not match the agreed completion date.
  5. Client version: an approved version is produced in your firm's layout for the case handler to send, with the version recorded on the file.
  6. Completion day view: on the day, the statement is shown alongside expected and received funds for a final reconciliation.

How completion day changes

The statement stays current as documents arrive, and the case handler knows what has changed since the client last saw it. Checking becomes a review of flagged lines rather than a full rebuild. Completion day starts with figures that reconcile, not a scramble.

Clients get a statement they can trust, and fewer surprises.

Does this happen to you?

  • Completion statements are built or rebuilt in Excel.
  • Updated redemption figures do not always reach the statement.
  • Clients have been sent a statement with the wrong figures.
  • Figures fail to reconcile on completion day.
  • Every statement is checked line by line because nobody trusts it.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The questions readers ask us after this guide.

Still have a question?

Ask us directly — a senior engineer will get back to you.

Ask about your project

Does this replace the statement tool in our case management system?

If your system's tool can be set up to do this well, we will say so. Often we add the source tracking and change detection around it.

Can it handle leasehold apportionments?

It can calculate apportionments from the figures and dates you set, and it shows the workings for the case handler to check.

Does it read redemption statements automatically?

Yes, it reads the figures and daily rate from lender statements, and flags any it cannot read clearly.

Is the case handler still responsible for the statement?

Yes. The tool assembles and checks; the case handler approves every version before it goes to the client.

Keep reading

More on Problems We Solve

Start here

Tell us where your conveyancing files get stuck

Describe the step, the case management system you use and roughly how many files your team runs. We will say what we would automate, what should stay with a case handler, and if a change to your current setup would do the job, we will tell you that instead.

  1. You tell us what you needTwo minutes on the form, or a message on WhatsApp.
  2. A senior engineer reviews itAnd comes back with questions, a realistic range and an honest view on fit.
  3. Free 30-minute scoping callWe talk through scope, options and a realistic estimate — with no obligation.
Free estimateNo obligation

Talk to someone who builds this

Send a short brief and we will come back with an honest view and a realistic range.

Takes under a minute. We never share your details.

  • Free consultation
  • No commitment
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk? Book a free 30-minute call →