Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
AI Apps

Which Model Should Your Application Use?

Last updated:

The question assumes a single answer

“Which model is best” presumes one workload. Most business applications involve several tasks — classification, extraction, retrieval, generation — and those want different models.

The productive question is: for each step, what is the cheapest model that meets the quality bar for that step?

Routing by difficulty

TaskTierWhy
Classification, routingSmall and fastSimple decisions, high volume
ExtractionSmall to midStructured output, easily verified
Answering from contextMidComprehension rather than deep reasoning
Drafting for reviewMid to largeQuality is visible to the reader
Multi-step reasoningLargePlanning quality determines the outcome

Test on your data, not on benchmarks

Public benchmarks measure general capability and correlate loosely with performance on your specific job. A few hundred of your own cases with agreed answers settles the question in an afternoon.

That set is also what lets you switch models later without re-testing everything by hand, which matters because better and cheaper options appear every few months.

Design for replacement

  • Prompts in configuration, not scattered through code
  • The provider abstracted behind a thin interface
  • No dependence on provider-specific quirks unless the benefit is large
  • The evaluation set rerun automatically on any model change

Latency is a product decision

A user waiting has a different tolerance from a background job. Interactive features need fast first tokens and benefit from streaming; batch processing can use slower, cheaper, stronger models.

Decide the latency budget per feature before choosing, because it eliminates options quickly and prevents a late redesign.

Frequently asked questions

Should we always use the newest model?

Test it rather than assume. Newer is usually better and occasionally behaves differently in ways that break a tuned prompt. That is exactly what the evaluation set catches.

How often should we review the choice?

Quarterly, or when a provider announces something materially better or cheaper. With an evaluation set the review is an afternoon.

Is it worth using two providers?

For resilience, some teams route to a fallback during outages. It adds complexity and is worth it where downtime has a real business cost.

How do we compare cost fairly?

Per completed task at your real prompt sizes, not per token. A cheaper-per-token model needing more retries can cost more in practice.

Keep reading

Paying top-tier prices for simple classification?

Routing by difficulty often halves an AI bill. Tell us what your feature does and we will look at where it can be cheaper.

Book a free 30-minute call Get a project estimate WhatsApp us

Related services

What we build for problems like this one

AI AgentsCustom Software DevelopmentSaaS Development