Think Build Implement Repeat
London, UK +44 7367 067226
WhatsApp FOLLOW f in X
Web Development

What Happens After Launch

Last updated:

Launch is the middle of the project

Businesses treat launch as the end and it is closer to the halfway point. Everything until launch is a hypothesis about what visitors want; everything after it is evidence.

The sites that keep working are the ones where somebody spends a couple of hours a month on them. The sites that need replacing in three years are the ones nobody touched.

Week one: watch and fix

  • Check forms actually deliver — send a real one and confirm it arrives
  • Watch error tracking daily; the first week surfaces browser and device issues
  • Check analytics is recording, before you need the numbers
  • Spot-check redirects if this was a migration
  • Ask three customers to use it and watch them without helping
The single most common post-launch failure we are called about is a contact form that has been silently failing since the day it went live.

Month one: measure, do not redesign

Resist changing things based on opinion in the first month. Gather data instead: where people arrive, where they leave, which pages get read, how many enquiries per hundred visitors.

One month of real behaviour will contradict at least one confident assumption from the design process. That contradiction is the most valuable thing the project produces.

Month three: the first improvement round

  1. Fix the page with high traffic and high exit — it is losing people who wanted something
  2. Strengthen whatever converts best; there is usually one page doing most of the work
  3. Cut or merge pages nobody visits
  4. Add the answers to the questions your enquiries keep asking
  5. Re-check speed on real devices, since content has been added since launch

This round typically costs a few days and produces more measurable improvement than the last month of the original build did.

The maintenance that prevents decay

TaskFrequencyWhy
Software and dependency updatesMonthlySecurity, and avoiding a big-bang upgrade
Backup restore testQuarterlyUntested backups are a hypothesis
Broken link checkQuarterlyExternal links rot constantly
Speed checkQuarterlyContent added since launch slows things
Content reviewTwice a yearPrices, staff, services, claims
Analytics reviewMonthlyFifteen minutes, and it catches drops early

That is perhaps two hours a month. Sites that get it stay usable for five or six years; sites that do not need replacing in three, which is a much larger bill.

When to rebuild rather than improve

Improve when the structure is sound and the problems are page-level. Rebuild when the platform is unsupported, the content model cannot express what the business now does, or maintenance costs more than a rebuild would.

“It looks dated” is on its own a poor reason. A dated site that converts is doing its job, and the budget is better spent on the pages that do not.

Frequently asked questions

How much should we budget for maintenance?

Around 15–20% of the build cost per year covers updates, monitoring, backups and a small block of change time.

Do you offer a support retainer?

Yes, monthly and cancellable. It covers updates, monitoring, backups and a set number of change hours.

When should we do a proper review?

At three months, twelve months and then annually. The three-month one is the most valuable because the data is fresh and the decisions are still cheap.

What if we want to make changes ourselves?

That is what the CMS and the two-page guide are for. Most clients handle content themselves and call us for anything structural.

Keep reading

Planning a website or a web application?

Tell us what it needs to do and who for. We will tell you which of the four kinds of project it actually is, and what that costs.

Book a free 30-minute call Get a project estimate WhatsApp us

Related services

What we build for problems like this one

Web DevelopmentCustom Software Development