How Long a Website Project Really Takes
Last updated:
Where the weeks actually go
Clients usually assume the time is design and coding. On a typical brochure site it is closer to a third each for planning, building and finishing — and the finishing third is where surprises live.
| Phase | Share | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery and structure | 15% | Sitemap, page purposes, questions to answer |
| Design | 25% | Key templates, not every page |
| Build | 35% | Templates, components, CMS |
| Content population | 15% | Usually the client, usually late |
| Testing and launch | 10% | Devices, forms, redirects, analytics |
Realistic ranges
- Brochure site, 5–15 pages: 3–6 weeks
- Lead-generation site with research: 6–12 weeks
- Content platform with a CMS: 10–20 weeks
- E-commerce, standard platform: 8–16 weeks
- Web application: 12–24 weeks
These assume decisions arrive within a few days and content arrives roughly when promised. Both assumptions are optimistic and both are why we quote ranges.
The three delays that cause most overruns
- Content. By a distance the largest cause. Everyone underestimates writing thirty pages of copy while doing their actual job.
- Feedback rounds. Design feedback that takes ten days instead of two, three times, is a month.
- Approval by committee. Five stakeholders with conflicting opinions and no tiebreaker can add six weeks without anyone doing anything wrong.
We have never had a project delayed because the code was hard. We have had many delayed because the About page was not written.
How we protect the timeline
- Placeholder content from day one, so the build never waits for copy
- A named decision-maker, agreed at kick-off
- Feedback windows with dates in the plan, not open-ended requests
- Design approved on two key templates rather than every page
- A content deadline two weeks before launch, stated plainly at the start
The last one does most of the work. A content deadline set at the beginning is a shared plan; the same deadline mentioned in week nine is a complaint.
What we can and cannot compress
Compressible: design rounds, page count in phase one, the number of stakeholders reviewing, bespoke illustration.
Not compressible: testing, accessibility, redirects on a migration, and the content itself. Cutting testing to hit a date reliably produces a launch week spent firefighting, which costs more time than it saved.
Launching in stages
If the date is immovable, launch a smaller site on time rather than a bigger one late. A five-page site live on the date, with the rest published over the following month, is almost always better than a fifteen-page site three weeks after the event.
This works because the pages people actually need are a small fraction of the pages a project plan contains, and you find out which ones by watching real traffic rather than by guessing in a workshop.
Frequently asked questions
Can you build a site in a week?
Why do some agencies quote much shorter timelines?
What if we need it before a specific date?
How much of our time will it take?
Planning a website or a web application?
Tell us what it needs to do and who for. We will tell you which of the four kinds of project it actually is, and what that costs.
Related services
What we build for problems like this one